<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Vick&#039;s Indictment Damages the Atlanta Falcons Reputation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purposeweb.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/</link>
	<description>purpose driven web marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwight burke</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>dwight burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Michael Vick, the qb, has been vilified in 31 cities because, basically, he&#039;s not a very good qb. he has, at best, a mediocre arm.  &lt;br&gt;Now he&#039;s being vilified in 50 states.  &lt;br&gt;I&#039;m cool with Goodell&#039;s decision.  He&#039;s presumed innocent, let him play.  Let him lead you to the playoffs, and maybe even go to Hawaii.  And then be convicted and face sentencing in March &#039;08. Or maybe January &#039;08, in the first week of the playoffs.  &lt;br&gt;For the first time since 1983, I&#039;m glad I&#039;m a Philly fan.  No matter what decision you make, it&#039;s gonna suck for Atlanta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Vick, the qb, has been vilified in 31 cities because, basically, he&#39;s not a very good qb. he has, at best, a mediocre arm.  <br />Now he&#39;s being vilified in 50 states.  <br />I&#39;m cool with Goodell&#39;s decision.  He&#39;s presumed innocent, let him play.  Let him lead you to the playoffs, and maybe even go to Hawaii.  And then be convicted and face sentencing in March &#39;08. Or maybe January &#39;08, in the first week of the playoffs.  <br />For the first time since 1983, I&#39;m glad I&#39;m a Philly fan.  No matter what decision you make, it&#39;s gonna suck for Atlanta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editorial Director, How Blogazine</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Editorial Director, How Blogazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>.I admire your blog. You share a lot of concern for issues that we cover and will cover at the How Blogazine (www.HowsMatter.com/blog).

Author Dov Seidman recently posted on the effect Barry Bonds&#039; reputation will have on the way people will view his achievements through history. He compares it to how businesses must learn to deal with the effect of reputation on their efforts. I think you&#039;ll find it fascinating.

If you are interested, you&#039;ll find it at http://howblogazine.com/barry-bonds-makes-the-number-but-misses-the-mark

We&#039;ll be following your work here.

Nelson Handel, Editorial Director
How Blogazine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.I admire your blog. You share a lot of concern for issues that we cover and will cover at the How Blogazine (www.HowsMatter.com/blog).</p>
<p>Author Dov Seidman recently posted on the effect Barry Bonds&#8217; reputation will have on the way people will view his achievements through history. He compares it to how businesses must learn to deal with the effect of reputation on their efforts. I think you&#8217;ll find it fascinating.</p>
<p>If you are interested, you&#8217;ll find it at <a href="http://howblogazine.com/barry-bonds-makes-the-number-but-misses-the-mark" rel="nofollow">http://howblogazine.com/barry-bonds-makes-the-number-but-misses-the-mark</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be following your work here.</p>
<p>Nelson Handel, Editorial Director<br />
How Blogazine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Whitford</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Whitford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 03:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>your right about Atlantic Falcons only responding to outside pressures. They don&#039;t feel the outrage a normal human being feels. Neither does the NFL. I am so saddened by this realization. I will never attend another NFL game or watch one on tv ever again. I am truly revolted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your right about Atlantic Falcons only responding to outside pressures. They don&#8217;t feel the outrage a normal human being feels. Neither does the NFL. I am so saddened by this realization. I will never attend another NFL game or watch one on tv ever again. I am truly revolted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwight burke</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>dwight burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Daniel,
Yes we agree on letting it play out in the courts even if it takes years on appeals.  But I want to point something out about your reply to Cheryl.  You said &quot;â€œDonâ€™t say innocent until proven guiltyâ€.  That is a misquoted legal term that applies only to the judicial branch.  The presumption of innocence  (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence) is an important part of our government, but it doesn&#039;t hold the person on the street to that standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,<br />
Yes we agree on letting it play out in the courts even if it takes years on appeals.  But I want to point something out about your reply to Cheryl.  You said &#8220;â€œDonâ€™t say innocent until proven guiltyâ€.  That is a misquoted legal term that applies only to the judicial branch.  The presumption of innocence  (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence</a>) is an important part of our government, but it doesn&#8217;t hold the person on the street to that standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avram</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Avram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/michael-vicks-indictment-damages-the-atlanta-falcons-reputation/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Clearly, the Falcons and the NFL believe their fans care more about winning than about animals&#039; lives. It&#039;s really awful and tarnishes the sport, even if they choose to suspend him at a later time.

Clearly, if they suspend him now, they&#039;re only responding to &quot;outside pressure,&quot; not doing what they think is right. What does that say?

The public is overwhelmingly against Vick. At my day job, we put up a neat interactive poll and 90% so far have voted against Vick:

http://www.ugo.com/a/love-or-hate/?person=michael-vick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, the Falcons and the NFL believe their fans care more about winning than about animals&#8217; lives. It&#8217;s really awful and tarnishes the sport, even if they choose to suspend him at a later time.</p>
<p>Clearly, if they suspend him now, they&#8217;re only responding to &#8220;outside pressure,&#8221; not doing what they think is right. What does that say?</p>
<p>The public is overwhelmingly against Vick. At my day job, we put up a neat interactive poll and 90% so far have voted against Vick:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ugo.com/a/love-or-hate/?person=michael-vick" rel="nofollow">http://www.ugo.com/a/love-or-hate/?person=michael-vick</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

