<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 3 Levels of Aggressive Reputation Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purposeweb.com/the-3-levels-of-aggressive-reputation-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-3-levels-of-aggressive-reputation-management/</link>
	<description>purpose driven web marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Critchlow</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-3-levels-of-aggressive-reputation-management/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Critchlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 14:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/the-3-levels-of-aggressive-reputation-management/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the hat-tip, we&#039;re obviously very big on online reputation management over at Distilled and I think we&#039;ll see more and more companies straying into the level 2 and level 3 over the next 12 months or so. Currently only a very small percentage strays outside of level 1 - and a lot of companies don&#039;t even manage that!

I&#039;d also welcome a more in-depth discussion about what you&#039;ve called the &#039;black-hat reputation management&#039;. It&#039;s a neat term and one which I think is appropriate.

When I buy products (both offline and online) 99% of the time I will do my research online, reading reviews and comments about the products in various locations. When you realise that some of these comments may be &#039;less-than-genuine&#039; then you realise that this is going to become a much bigger issue in the coming months/years. It will be interesting to see how this develops and what systems develop to try and minimise the impact of the fake UGC.

I look forward to your in-depth posts on each level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel,</p>
<p>Thanks for the hat-tip, we&#8217;re obviously very big on online reputation management over at Distilled and I think we&#8217;ll see more and more companies straying into the level 2 and level 3 over the next 12 months or so. Currently only a very small percentage strays outside of level 1 &#8211; and a lot of companies don&#8217;t even manage that!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also welcome a more in-depth discussion about what you&#8217;ve called the &#8216;black-hat reputation management&#8217;. It&#8217;s a neat term and one which I think is appropriate.</p>
<p>When I buy products (both offline and online) 99% of the time I will do my research online, reading reviews and comments about the products in various locations. When you realise that some of these comments may be &#8216;less-than-genuine&#8217; then you realise that this is going to become a much bigger issue in the coming months/years. It will be interesting to see how this develops and what systems develop to try and minimise the impact of the fake UGC.</p>
<p>I look forward to your in-depth posts on each level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Critchlow</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-3-levels-of-aggressive-reputation-management/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Critchlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/the-3-levels-of-aggressive-reputation-management/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a really good breakdown - good work.

I think you are right about the riskiness of what you call black hat reputation management. Online promotion always falls somewhere on a scale from white to black, but particularly when you are trying to protect your reputation, it seems silly to me to go down high-risk routes that could be counter-productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really good breakdown &#8211; good work.</p>
<p>I think you are right about the riskiness of what you call black hat reputation management. Online promotion always falls somewhere on a scale from white to black, but particularly when you are trying to protect your reputation, it seems silly to me to go down high-risk routes that could be counter-productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

