<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wall Street Journal Highlights Ineffective Reputation Management Practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purposeweb.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/</link>
	<description>purpose driven web marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment Spammer</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment Spammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Great work here, reputation is everything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work here, reputation is everything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Dessinger</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Dessinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to comment, Carlotta. Re-posting someone else&#039;s article is actually harmful to their search engine optimization, so I opted against including the entire article you pasted below your initial response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment, Carlotta. Re-posting someone else&#8217;s article is actually harmful to their search engine optimization, so I opted against including the entire article you pasted below your initial response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlotta</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely right! Love your post! Reputation Defender sucks...highly NOT recommended. For more info: http://www.searchengineguide.com/jennifer-laycock/when-your-onlin.php I don&#039;t know if I am allowed to post links. If I am not, here is the article of Jennifer Laycock:

[article removed]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right! Love your post! Reputation Defender sucks&#8230;highly NOT recommended. For more info: <a href="http://www.searchengineguide.com/jennifer-laycock/when-your-onlin.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchengineguide.com/jennifer-laycock/when-your-onlin.php</a> I don&#8217;t know if I am allowed to post links. If I am not, here is the article of Jennifer Laycock:</p>
<p>[article removed]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking up People Online and Defending Reputation</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking up People Online and Defending Reputation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>[...] Reputation Advisor, a blog focusing on managing online reputation, points out two lessons learned from the WSJ article as well as problems with the article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reputation Advisor, a blog focusing on managing online reputation, points out two lessons learned from the WSJ article as well as problems with the article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Distilled - Monitoring your Reputation Online &#187; Wall Street Journal rubbishes Reputation Management</title>
		<link>http://www.purposeweb.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Distilled - Monitoring your Reputation Online &#187; Wall Street Journal rubbishes Reputation Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationadvisor.com/the-wall-street-journal-highlights-ineffective-reputation-management-practices/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] We came across an article in the Wall Street Journal via Reputation Advisor. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We came across an article in the Wall Street Journal via Reputation Advisor. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

